Good books to read Maths Unwrapped sustainability

The Double Helix PDF ¶ The Double PDF/EPUB ²

By identifying the structure of DNA the molecule of life Francis Crick and James Watson revolutionized biochemistry won themselves a Nobel Prize At the time Watson was only 24 a young scientist hungry to make his mark His uncompromisingly honest account of the heady days of their thrilling sprint against other world class researchers to solve one of science's greatest mysteries gives a dazzlingly clear picture of a world of brilliant scientists with great gifts very human ambitions bitter rivalries With humility unspoiled by false modesty Watson relates his Crick's desperate efforts to beat Linus Pauling to the Holy Grail of life sciences the identification of the basic building block of life Never has a scientist been so truthful in capturing in words the flavor of his work


10 thoughts on “The Double Helix

  1. PtyץlVES&MQyU4M ^@}l;?$In¬zʕ*VRCMQVR,l e`0=*_ _O1RP{WT($LkK1;Xf^o.ts$sMpRC#KwSA_!RKj_CXL.\6,- P!Ք65b"^LSTOmc/iiP_IR`>Rk W|$[M =b |ndCX0` he2 aMA+GBGD'<*_.'R4; \MܿB4#Wo[1ĐēbMI8j`\x^!уك|%VDb5zڢt 4jUnӔEN#bF.=haبȣ& 1R% #\4 5ZnI"&"RIBK#v,ѺS2x&ErgF&zrpBg'DH5uG4rlұDfq܆.f``&5tp82@:6hlTD` cWd^)qMj螓'GOy*l$e@Ceơfck9P7` tn"A`$Uh6AmY@Qà2*+opȡD/6B,S)Ͻ }5T84&2:t,-^OajO#]9H@%SREc+23f kIȲ!QHa Ў):rm|AsBY#g174.Ӭ `?*:R a0\BYƌc?  C sXs|^, _t%OWesY~P@@Ei܁@P85 'yir6ib&EPlΪ_P DXŦIqbbWﲈ4@P EZv |g"Ӭ )>钋cm PX F 졳iK-z,ͦa(98ńt A (zFN#440`UFB#@4N͌["46WhMa*XJE 6B#U`7!o%Iu>R凓@^RwYaPPtIg}ʢ8,V92®oq=Y c9l4%CfXu/axCf`.pXw#eA| cX4OBD/e XPj Ȓ]T,ls ۱l \v@}JkaPĀcR/HbCO;AXgR/)!1AQaq 0@@@AP9 w$# )=X-v X61(0^B}2H~'34&Ʃ-ɦS3L9z|ƫX@kpaaN<D'R_u1pE@\o})oBm5E=# .#,xT9-1&a2;޸~'dc'UW*qzt"SkgkPnw{隄=0ͽn L3; "i42zɁ_*աev1HΎ S0ptr:Nqvxfd:a[2r[o^3{!_# G tF`\W|iQl"4ģ ZXb*ЂUTLy3_`R1ʏ-⸛s RM/,j[pXxZG=b|i.Y!;6M<d>E]# !r ^"c,`2`^޹mmX#Gbf5\JkQ8V_{)\80sNsTr-*ͱ`b@#q{?hV]קj"a@xn]5/0dn%Emә t %閉'%h{`8l6&Tʥ)Yae6 ,n 06Jm"< `vF:0_m !ta[.DcL6.AL%♉yr-n 60 00Z ['3u9Uf"I00ε<%PP !pȢ%RO>bC wZAA]GS՘ DI| EqM(QO*R$8b[URQ Wm%Uj^ry?$xFjRG Dd.Md1ps Cq.Gњy+s aןlszGUZbȝRCVè x؍%dWXrPXǜ/bszHPq2ƺQ0z1Zaʢ{pDq`T3Pfk0cN5I@&+ Q`1SpY}{q0y~:vm=,ZQm]b<:.&Rҽ<Df5^U{QK`Ļ(h8  5V&0Fx.w4wsO\#Aba{\9YxݜU R㙏|/RG`"٪+ 0Q{Eꕀasʛ3fҔ. _.<9hW :P(o*yFՑ4s/ Z->m|_ܾx=KMn#c֩ձHU+.P |G<='}_+PIUWyu` ۿL3VQ}כf8npYK!Gg ޣM_LƛINhдUR4>8dz 9`vFY !y}a!S2ӀxFfMD%'g8tMlq'ܠ[h =.* Rخryk-rd:24gRT|LpޭMqVpחdP=S _0f)];hQ`0d1 d /:8^߃^Vb2};ZëC5"hqoqpq׉XQ] a k }#Z4wy s,tl[.xW 7[VԣNUN+Uk+P^ q~zEy'>rlQ@Rl{L<K ;<[ G&M]_SX |-xGP;EƎ#&9<lsu]A "CHfUvb!,cʰ̻;2AwDJ0p !VX<L+oqCmƀ#9& *숅x:" B2a?gB4t)PNyGrJPrPZ2kOEhi9yCT, V%jv cٵ` g# !01AQ2a@BO (E ! #B hpcҺVKkm=6߳G'lqJ(C+D=A3HD(D EF@I DI ĎK '(cQaSSb/ zP4к g(!UnP - rfݟꜨfсaO+YPĔؽH ;FNӅЏ B8xBpx?R4(| ӆ<`­`wF6jC8T}ĐqEU4PaIvfރ%8b}(VikUn6UGN$UI3Sȏ5*Kd,Q$SѡfpûH`ԁrg2!|mE@Hͣ7%Di1$JRڑsAka-dHvxƑ7nNDPtyץlVES&MQyU4M ^@}l;?$In¬zʕ*VRCMQVR,l e`0=*_ _O1RP{WT($LkK1;Xf^o.ts$sMpRC#KwSA_!RKj_CXL.\6,- P!Ք65b"^LSTOmc/iiP_IR`>Rk W|$[M =b |ndCX0` he2 aMA+GBGD'<*_.'R4; \MܿB4#Wo[1ĐēbMI8j`\x^!уك|%VDb5zڢt 4jUnӔEN#bF.=haبȣ& 1R% #\4 5ZnI"&"RIBK#v,ѺS2x&ErgF&zrpBg'DH5uG4rlұDfq܆.f``&5tp82@:6hlTD` cWd^)qMj螓'GOy*l$e@Ceơfck9P7` tn"A`$Uh6AmY@Qà2*+opȡD/6B,S)Ͻ }5T84&2:t,-^OajO#]9H@%SREc+23f kIȲ!QHa Ў):rm|AsBY#g174.Ӭ `?*:R a0\BYƌc?  C sXs|^, _t%OWesY~P@@Ei܁@P85 'yir6ib&EPlΪ_P DXŦIqbbWﲈ4@P EZv |g"Ӭ )>钋cm PX F 졳iK-z,ͦa(98ńt A (zFN#440`UFB#@4N͌["46WhMa*XJE 6B#U`7!o%Iu>R凓@^RwYaPPtIg}ʢ8,V92®oq=Y c9l4%CfXu/axCf`.pXw#eA| cX4OBD/e XPj Ȓ]T,ls ۱l \v@}JkaPĀcR/HbCO;AXgR/)!1AQaq 0@@@AP9 w$# )=X-v X61(0^B}2H~'34&Ʃ-ɦS3L9z|ƫX@kpaaN<D'R_u1pE@\o})oBm5E=# .#,xT9-1&a2;޸~'dc'UW*qzt"SkgkPnw{隄=0ͽn L3; "i42zɁ_*աev1HΎ S0ptr:Nqvxfd:a[2r[o^3{!_# G tF`\W|iQl"4ģ ZXb*ЂUTLy3_`R1ʏ-⸛s RM/,j[pXxZG=b|i.Y!;6M<d>E]# !r ^"c,`2`^޹mmX#Gbf5\JkQ8V_{)\80sNsTr-*ͱ`b@#q{?hV]קj"a@xn]5/0dn%Emә t %閉'%h{`8l6&Tʥ)Yae6 ,n 06Jm"< `vF:0_m !ta[.DcL6.AL%♉yr-n 60 00Z ['3u9Uf"I00ε<%PP !pȢ%RO>bC wZAA]GS՘ DI| EqM(QO*R$8b[URQ Wm%Uj^ry?$xFjRG Dd.Md1ps Cq.Gњy+s aןlszGUZbȝRCVè x؍%dWXrPXǜ/bszHPq2ƺQ0z1Zaʢ{pDq`T3Pfk0cN5I@&+ Q`1SpY}{q0y~:vm=,ZQm]b<:.&Rҽ<Df5^U{QK`Ļ(h8  5V&0Fx.w4wsO\#Aba{\9YxݜU R㙏|/RG`"٪+ 0Q{Eꕀasʛ3fҔ. _.<9hW :P(o*yFՑ4s/ Z->m|_ܾx=KMn#c֩ձHU+.P |G<='}_+PIUWyu` ۿL3VQ}כf8npYK!Gg ޣM_LƛINhдUR4>8dz 9`vFY !y}a!S2ӀxFfMD%'g8tMlq'ܠ[h =.* Rخryk-rd:24gRT|LpޭMqVpחdP=S _0f)];hQ`0d1 d /:8^߃^Vb2};ZëC5"hqoqpq׉XQ] a k }#Z4wy s,tl[.xW 7[VԣNUN+Uk+P^ q~zEy'>rlQ@Rl{L<K ;<[ G&M]_SX |-xGP;EƎ#&9<lsu]A "CHfUvb!,cʰ̻;2AwDJ0p !VX<L+oqCmƀ#9& *숅x:" B2a?gB4t)PNyGrJPrPZ2kOEhi9yCT, V%jv cٵ` g# !01AQ2a@BO (E ! #B hpcҺVKkm=6߳G'lqJ(C+D=A3HD(D EF@I DI ĎK '(cQaSSb/ zP4к g(!UnP - rfݟꜨfсaO+YPĔؽH ;FNӅЏ B8xBpx?R4(| ӆ<`­`wF6jC8T}ĐqEU4PaIvfރ%8b}(VikUn6UGN$UI3Sȏ5*Kd,Q$SѡfpûH`ԁrg2!|mE@Hͣ7%Di1$JRڑsAka-dHvxƑ7nND says:

    Do not view my rating on this book as an indictment of the science The story of the discovery of the structure of DNA is a fascinating one and makes for a compelling must read book The research behind it merited a Nobel Award But as any first year science student worth their salt can tell you it is a story mired in controversy I was enthralled by the continuous advancement of ideas that led to the double helical model that we all are familiar with today but what is deeply unsettling about this account of those events is the almost casual misogyny that bleeds off practically every page that features Rosalind Franklin I don't think that one or two paragraphs in an epilogue to attempt to paint her in a better light after defaming her character for the entirety of what has gone before it can fully rectify the situation This book recounts the occurrences during the early 1950s from the viewpoint of James Watson so the question could be asked does the time period and accepted societal viewpoints excuse his narration of the events? This was a highly educated man An intelligent man Surely a man such as that should be held to higher standards and should have been a voice for equality and not one spreading misogynistic ideas?If Franklin had lived it also would have highlighted the quandary over whether or not she would she have been awarded a Nobel prize too? Undoubtedly her work was a key component in determining the structure of DNA However a Nobel Prize can only be awarded to a maximum of three people Who would have lost out? Would perhaps the medical prize have been awarded to Watson and Crick and the chemistry prize to Franklin and Wilkins? Sadly we will never know Rosalind Franklin died from ovarian cancer before the awarding of the 1962 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine which was jointly awarded to Francis Harry Compton Crick James Dewey Watson and Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins for their discoveries concerning the molecular structure of nucleic acids and its significance for information transfer in living material ref wwwnobelprizeorgHas history been too kind to Rosalind Franklin and placed too much gravitas on her scientific work? Do we vilify James Watson and triumph Franklin as some sort of wronged feminist icon? Would Watson and Crick have determined DNA structure as quickly without access to Franklin's researchI know what I believeFive stars for the science But one star for the blatant misogyny which I cannot condoneA prior knowledge of DNA structure and protein synthesis is best to enjoy this book and at the very least some basic understanding of the various principles of chemical bonding